Token & Community Agents
>-
Token & Community Agents¶
Five agents covering the full token lifecycle - from discovering quality tokens and vetting a new launch, to screening airdrop recipients, analysing who actually holds a given token, and auditing smart contract safety.
chainaware-token-ranker¶
Model: claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | Tools: token_rank_list
Discovers and ranks tokens by the strength of their holder community. Uses the median Wallet Rank of all qualifying holders - not price, volume, or social metrics. Covers 2,500+ tokens across Ethereum, BNB Smart Chain, Base, and Solana.
Example prompts¶
Top AI tokens on Ethereum by community quality
Best DeFi tokens on BNB Chain - rank by holder strength
Which RWA tokens have the strongest holder base on Base?
Token leaderboard for Solana - DeFi category
Rank all DeFAI tokens across chains and show me the top 10
Compare community quality across these 3 tokens: [address1], [address2], [address3] on ETH
Example output¶
TOKEN RANKING - AI Tokens | Ethereum
Sorted by: Community Rank (lower = better quality holders)
Rank Token Address Community Rank Holders Norm. Rank
1 $AITOKEN 0xAbc... 142 4,821 0.91
2 $MLCOIN 0xDef... 391 2,104 0.84
3 $NEURAL 0xGhi... 847 8,932 0.76
4 $DEEPLEARN 0xJkl... 1,204 1,247 0.68
5 $AGENTCOIN 0xMno... 2,891 19,203 0.51
...
Interpretation:
#1 $AITOKEN: Top 1% holder quality - sophisticated, experienced wallets.
Strong signal of organic adoption by genuine DeFi participants.
#5 $AGENTCOIN: Mid-tier holder quality despite large holder count.
Large holder base may include airdrop farmers or bots.
Supported categories:
- AI Token, RWA Token, DeFi Token, DeFAI Token, DePIN Token
- Networks: Ethereum, BNB Smart Chain, Base, Solana
chainaware-token-analyzer¶
Model: claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | Tools: token_rank_single, predictive_fraud
Deep-dive into a single token: community rank, top holders ranked by global wallet rank, and fraud screening on the top holder set. Tells you not just who holds the token - but whether those holders are legitimate.
Example prompts¶
Who holds this token? 0xTokenContract... on Ethereum
Token rank for 0xContract... on BNB Chain
Best holders of 0xToken... - show me their wallet ranks
Is this token held by whales or bots? 0xContract... on Base
Holder analysis for this token - are the top holders legitimate? 0x...
Screen the top 20 holders of 0xToken... for fraud
Example output¶
TOKEN ANALYSIS
Contract: 0xTokenContract... | Network: Ethereum
Community Rank: 284 (Top 15% of tracked tokens)
TOP HOLDERS
Rank Holder Global Rank Fraud Risk Position
1 0xHolder1... #4,291 ✅ 0.02 ✅ 12.4% supply
2 0xHolder2... #18,402 ✅ 0.04 ✅ 8.1% supply
3 0xHolder3... #2,899 ✅ 0.03 ✅ 6.7% supply
4 0xHolder4... #841,234 ⚠️ 0.61 ⚠️ 4.2% supply
5 0xHolder5... #1,240,981 ⚠️ 0.08 ✅ 3.8% supply
[+ 15 more]
⚠️ FRAUD FLAG: Holder #4 (0xHolder4...) has elevated fraud risk (0.61).
Holds 4.2% of supply. Monitor for potential sell pressure / exit.
SUMMARY
Top holders with clean history: 17/20 (85%)
High-risk holders: 2/20 (10%)
Unknown/insufficient data: 1/20 (5%)
Conclusion: Predominantly held by legitimate wallets. One elevated-risk
holder worth monitoring. Overall holder quality is strong.
chainaware-token-launch-auditor¶
Model: claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | Tools: predictive_rug_pull, predictive_fraud, predictive_behaviour
Pre-listing launch safety audit combining contract rug pull risk and deployer wallet screening. Returns a Launch Safety Score, a verdict (APPROVED / CONDITIONAL / REJECTED), and specific conditions if applicable.
Designed for DEXes, CEXes, and launchpads that need an objective first-pass check before committing resources to a listing.
Example prompts¶
Should we list this token? Contract: 0xToken... Deployer: 0xDev... on Ethereum
Audit this launch before we promote it: 0xToken... on BNB Chain
Is this deployer trustworthy? 0xDeployer... - they want a listing on our DEX
Vet this IDO before we feature it: token=0x... deployer=0x... on Base
Launch safety check - new token launching in 2 hours: 0xContract... deployer=0x...
Pre-listing safety check for 3 new token submissions: [token+deployer pairs]
Example output¶
TOKEN LAUNCH AUDIT
Token: 0xToken... | Deployer: 0xDev... | Network: Ethereum
Launch Safety Score: 84 / 100
Verdict: ✅ APPROVED
Rug Pull Risk: 0.09 - Low
Deployer Profile:
Fraud probability: 0.04 ✅
Experience: High (Veteran, 2.8 years) ✅
Prior launches: 3 (all survived >6 months) ✅
AML flags: None ✅
Safety Badge: 🟢 Verified Launch
Listing conditions: None. Standard listing recommended.
TOKEN LAUNCH AUDIT
Token: 0xNewToken... | Deployer: 0xFresh... | Network: BNB Chain
Launch Safety Score: 31 / 100
Verdict: 🔴 REJECTED
Rug Pull Risk: 0.81 - Critical
Deployer Profile:
Fraud probability: 0.77 ⚠️
Wallet age: 12 days ⚠️
Prior launches: 1 (confirmed rug pull 3 months ago) 🛑
AML flags: Mixer interaction ⚠️
Recommendation: Reject listing application. Deployer has prior rug history
and shows all behavioural signatures of a repeat offender.
TOKEN LAUNCH AUDIT
Token: 0xMid... | Deployer: 0xMod... | Network: Base
Launch Safety Score: 62 / 100
Verdict: 🟡 CONDITIONAL
Rug Pull Risk: 0.34 - Moderate
Deployer Profile:
Fraud probability: 0.18 - Elevated ⚠️
Experience: Moderate (intermediate, 11 months)
Prior launches: 0 (first project)
Listing conditions:
1. Require minimum 6-month LP lock before listing
2. Request deployer KYC before promoting
3. Monitor deployer wallet for 30 days post-launch
4. Reduce initial liquidity exposure
chainaware-airdrop-screener¶
Model: claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | Tools: predictive_behaviour, predictive_fraud, predictive_behaviour_batch, predictive_fraud_batch, check_job_status, get_job_results
Batch screens wallets for airdrop eligibility. Filters bots, fraud accounts, and fresh Sybil wallets. Ranks eligible wallets by reputation score to enable merit-based allocations. Returns eligible, flagged, and disqualified lists, plus suggested token allocations if a budget is provided.
Example prompts¶
Screen these wallets for our airdrop - filter out bots and fraud:
[list of 500 addresses] on Ethereum
Fair airdrop allocation for these wallets - $200k token budget:
[list] on BNB Chain
Sybil filter for our airdrop: [addresses] on Ethereum
Minimum fraud threshold: 0.3
Remove fake wallets from this list before we distribute rewards: [addresses]
Score and rank these 1,000 airdrop applicants by reputation:
[list] | Network: Ethereum | Token budget: $500,000
Example output¶
AIRDROP SCREENING REPORT
Input: 500 wallets | Network: Ethereum | Budget: $200,000
RESULTS SUMMARY
✅ Eligible: 347 wallets (69.4%)
⚠️ Flagged: 48 wallets (9.6%) - manual review recommended
🚫 Disqualified: 105 wallets (21.0%) - bots, fraud, or Sybil
DISQUALIFIED BREAKDOWN
High fraud risk (>0.5): 41 wallets
New/fresh wallets (<10 tx): 38 wallets
Known bot patterns: 18 wallets
AML flags: 8 wallets
COHORT BREAKDOWN (eligible wallets)
Veteran / Power Users: 62 (18%)
Intermediate: 143 (41%)
Beginner (legitimate): 89 (26%)
Casual / Low activity: 53 (15%)
TOKEN ALLOCATION (merit-based)
Top tier (reputation >2,500): 62 wallets × $1,200 = $74,400
Mid tier (rep 1,000-2,499): 143 wallets × $450 = $64,350
Base tier (rep <1,000): 142 wallets × $150 = $21,300
Reserve for flagged review: $39,950
Total allocated: $200,000 ✅
TOP 5 ELIGIBLE WALLETS (highest reputation)
1. 0xVet001... Score: 3,812 - Allocation: $1,200
2. 0xVet002... Score: 3,641 - Allocation: $1,200
3. 0xPow003... Score: 3,204 - Allocation: $1,200
[+ 59 more top-tier recipients]
chainaware-token-audit-analyst¶
Model: claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | Tools: run_token_audit, get_token_audit_result
Deep multi-module smart contract auditor. Runs run_token_audit (get-or-create) and polls get_token_audit_result when the audit is queued. Returns a 0-100 risk score, a verdict, and a breakdown across 8 modules: ownership, liquidity, supply, transfer, pausability, approve, permit, and reentrancy.
Complements chainaware-token-launch-auditor (which uses rug pull + deployer behavioral signals) by providing a code-level analysis of the contract itself.
Network note: Token audit tools use lowercase network values (
eth,bsc,base, etc.), unlike other ChainAware tools which use uppercase.
Example prompts¶
Audit this token contract: 0xContract... on Ethereum
Is this BSC token safe? 0xContract...
Run a full risk scan on this contract before I buy: 0x... on Base
Does this contract have hidden mint functions? 0x... on Arbitrum
Is there a kill switch in this token? 0x... on Polygon
Check liquidity lock and ownership for this contract: 0x... on eth
Full audit before we list this token - contract: 0x... deployer: 0x... on bsc
Example output¶
TOKEN AUDIT
Contract: 0xContract... | Network: Ethereum
Risk Score: 18 / 100
Verdict: CLEAN ✅
Module Results:
Ownership: PASS - Owner renounced, no privileged functions active
Liquidity: PASS - Liquidity locked for 12 months, sufficient TVL
Supply: PASS - No mint function, no deployer concentration
Transfer: PASS - All transfer invariants satisfied
Pausability: N/A - No pause function in contract
Approve: PASS - Standard ERC-20 approve implementation
Permit: N/A - EIP-2612 permit not implemented
Reentrancy: PASS - CEI pattern followed, no reentrancy paths detected
Honeypot Analysis: No Honeypot (score: 2/100)
Recommendation: ✅ Contract appears safe. No theft or rug mechanics detected.
LP lock active - verify lock duration before investing.
TOKEN AUDIT
Contract: 0xRiskyToken... | Network: BNB Chain
Risk Score: 79 / 100
Verdict: HIGH RISK 🔴
Module Results:
Ownership: FAIL - Owner is EOA with full blast radius (can mint, pause, blacklist)
Liquidity: WARN - Pool unlocked, low TVL ($12,400)
Supply: FAIL - Unbounded mint function, no cap
Transfer: PASS
Pausability: FAIL - Any transfer can be paused by owner instantly (monitoring flag set)
Approve: PASS
Permit: N/A
Reentrancy: PASS
Primary Signal: Unbounded mint + EOA owner with full control
Honeypot Analysis: Likely Honeypot (score: 61/100)
Flags: CONTROLLED_LAUNCH_MODE, EXTERNAL_CALL_IN_TRANSFER
Recommendation: 🔴 HIGH RISK. Owner can mint unlimited supply and freeze transfers.
Likely honeypot pattern detected. Do not buy.
Module status reference¶
| Status | Meaning |
|---|---|
PASS |
Module ran and found no issues |
WARN |
Risky pattern present but not definitively exploitable |
FAIL |
Dangerous finding - see module detail |
N/A |
Feature not present in this contract (not a red flag) |
Further Reading¶
- ChainAware's 32 Claude Sub-Agents - Fraud Tech and Growth Tech
- Token Audit: 10,000 CoinGecko Tokens Analysed - 55.2% HIGH RISK, 1% honeypots
- Web3 Sybil Protection Systems in 2026
See also: Specialised Agents | All Agents Overview